检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚清深[1] 秦军[1] 陈春媚[1] 覃运荣[1] 周林荣[1] 覃欣[1] 周腾贤
机构地区:[1]广西玉林市红十字会医院普外科二区,广西玉林537000
出 处:《中华乳腺病杂志(电子版)》2009年第3期23-26,共4页Chinese Journal of Breast Disease(Electronic Edition)
摘 要:目的探讨组织培养-终点染色-计算机图像分析(TECIA)法体外肿瘤药敏试验对乳腺癌化疗的临床应用价值。方法选取2005年9月至2008年9月本院手术的46例乳腺癌标本,采用TECIA法进行化疗药物敏感性的体外检测。所测药物为乳腺癌常用化疗药物紫杉醇(PTX)、诺维本(NVB)、多柔比星(ADM)、氨甲喋呤(MTX)、5-氟脲嘧啶(5-FU)、顺铂(DDP)及联合化疗TA(PTX+ADM)、NP(NVB+DDP)、CAF(CTX+ADM+5-FU)、CMF(CTX+MTX+5-FU)方案。化疗药物敏感性差异的比较,采用多个样本率的χ2检验。结果46例乳腺癌对化疗药物的敏感性为:PTX60.9%(28/46)、NVB58.7%(27/46)、ADM56.5%(27/46)、MTX37.0%(17/46)、5-FU34.8%(16/46)、DDP26.1%(12/46);PTX、NVB、ADM、MTX之间及5-FU和DDP之间比较,敏感率差异均无统计学意义(χ2=6.724,P=0.081;χ2=0.821,P=0.365),PTX、NVB比5-FU、DDP的敏感率高,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.003);TA、NP、CAF和CMF方案的敏感率分别为71.7%(33/46)、67.4%(31/46)、45.7%(21/46)、39.1%(18/46),但TA与NP方案、CAF与CMF方案比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.007);TA和NP方案比CAF和CMF方案的敏感率高,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.007)。PTX、NVB及含有此类药物的联合化疗方案的敏感性较高,化疗药物敏感性存在个体差异。结论TECIA法体外肿瘤药敏试验在乳腺癌的化疗用药方面具有指导意义。Objective To explore in vitro chemosensitivity of breast cancer with TECIA (tissue culture-end point staining-computer image analysis) and its clinic value in chemotherapy of breast cancer. Methods Forty-six specimens of breast cancer were selected from the patients who underwent breast cancer surgery from September 2005 to September 2008 in our hospital and were used for evaluating the chemosensitivity of breast cancer cells with TECIA. The drugs tested were the drugs commonly used for breast cancer including paclitaxol (PTX), navelbine (NVB), (adriamycin)ADM, methotrexate (MTX), (5-fluorouracil)5-FU, (cisplatin) DDP, and combined regimens as TA (PTX + ADM), NP (NVB+ DDP), CAF(CTX+ ADM+5- FU) and CMF(CTX+ MTX+ 5-FU). The drug sensitivity difference was compared using Chi square test. Results In the 46 specimens of breast cancer, the sensitivity to PTX was 60.9% (28/46), to NVB 58.7% (27/46), to ADM 56.5% (27/46), to MTX 37.0% (17/46), to 5-FU 34.8% (16/46)and toDDP 26.1% (12/46). There was no difference in PTX,NVB,ADM and MTX. Also, there was no difference in 5 FU and DDP(χ^2=6. 724,P=0. 081;χ^2 =0. 821,P=0. 365). The sensitivity of PTX and NVB was higher than that of MTX,5 FU and DDP(P〈0. 003). The sensitivity to TA, NP,CAF and CMF was 71.7%(33/46), 67. 4%(31/46), 45. 7% (21/46) and 39. 1% (18/46), respectively. There was no difference between TA and NP and between CAF and CMF (P〉0. 007). The sensitivity of TA and NP was higher than that of CAF and CMF, with statistical difference (P〈0. 007). The sensitivity of PTX and NVB or chemotherapy regimens with PTX and NVB was higher. There was individual difference in the sensitivity of chemotherapy drugs. Conclusion In vitro chemosensitivity of breast cancer with TECIA is of guiding significance in clinics.
关 键 词:乳腺肿瘤 药物筛选试验 组织培养-终点染色-计算机图像分析法 个体化化疗
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145