检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙瑶[1] 周仁来[2,1,3]
机构地区:[1]应用实验心理北京市重点实验室(北京师范大学),北京100875 [2]认知神经科学与学习国家重点实验室(北京师范大学),北京100875 [3]儿童发展和学习科学教育部重点实验室(东南大学),南京210096
出 处:《心理科学》2009年第3期528-530,583,共4页Journal of Psychological Science
摘 要:前瞻记忆中的TAP效应是指,当进行中任务和前瞻任务加工类型一致时,前瞻记忆成绩要好于两者加工类型不一致时。该研究采用双重任务范式,以大学生为被试,探讨了进行中任务难度对前瞻记忆TAP效应的影响,以揭示注意资源在TAP效应产生中的关键作用。结果表明:当进行中任务难度较低时,没有出现TAP效应,即进行中任务和前瞻任务的加工类型是否一致不会对前瞻记忆成绩产生显著影响;当进行中任务难度较高时,TAP效应部分出现。进一步说,当进行中任务加工类型为语义型时,语义型的前瞻任务成绩要显著好于结构型的前瞻任务成绩;而当进行中任务加工类型为结构型时,前瞻任务的加工类型没有对前瞻记忆成绩产生显著影响。The transfer-appropriate processing effect in prospective memory refers to the phenomenon that the performance of prospective memory is better when the processing types of the ongoing task and the prospective task are consistent than when they are inconsistent. Using the dual-task experimental paradigm, our research explored the influence of the ongoing task's resource demanding on the TAP effect in prospective memory. The result shows that the differences of the ongoing task's resource demanding do have an effect on the TAP effect in prospective memory. When the ongoing task is easy, whether or not the processing types of an ongoing task and a prospective task are consistent does not affect the performance of prospective memory; when the ongoing task is difficult, whether or not the processing types of the two tasks have an effect on prospective memory depends on the type of ongoing tasks. The TAP effect is found only under the condition of the semantic ongoing task. When the ongoing task requires perceptual processing, the processing type has no influence on the performance of prospective memory.
分 类 号:B842.3[哲学宗教—基础心理学] F762.6[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28