检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姜英杰[1] 聂玉强[1] 李瑜元[1] 张龙[1]
出 处:《现代消化及介入诊疗》2009年第2期71-73,共3页Modern Interventional Diagnosis and Treatment in Gastroenterology
摘 要:目的比较内镜下药物注射联合氩离子凝固治疗及单一治疗对上消化道溃疡出血的疗效。方法将303例内镜下有活动出血的溃疡患者分为3组。157例接受内镜下药物注射止血治疗,51例接受氩离子凝固止血治疗,95例接受药物注射联合氩离子凝固治疗。结果三种方法的即时止血率均为100%,有效止血率在药物注射组、氩离子及联合治疗组分别为为87.9%、86.3%、91.6%,三组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。所有病例无穿孔及其它术后并发症。结论药物注射联合氩离子凝固治疗为安全有效的止血方法,但并没有显著提高止血率。Objective To evaluate the effect of injection plus argon plasma coagulation therapy on upper gastrointestinal bleeding ulcer. Methods Three hundred and three patients with active ulcer bleeding or with- out visible bleeding vessels were involved in this study. One hundred and fifty-seven patients were treated with injection of adrenaline solution, 51 patients with argon beam coagulator, 95 patients with combination of injection and argon beam coagulator. Results The rate of immediate hemostasia in all cases was 100%, and the curative rates of three different treatments were 87.9% ,86.3% and 91.6%, respectively, no statistical difference was found among 3 groups (P 〉 0.05). No perforation and other postoperative complications occurred. Conclusions Endoscopic injection plus argon plasma coagulation therapy is an effective measure for stopping ulcer bleeding, but it does not significantly improve the rate of hemostasis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28