检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张伟京[1] 俞受程[1] 马恩普 林育松[1] 苏航[1] 刘秀珍
机构地区:[1]军事医学科学院附属医院
出 处:《军事医学科学院院刊》1998年第2期129-132,140,共5页Bulletin of the Academy of Military Medical Sciences
摘 要:目的:观察大剂量放、化疗加自身外周血造血干细胞移植(APBSCT)治疗难治性恶性淋巴瘤的疗效。方法:21例病人接受此治疗。分别用葡聚糖硫酸酯(DS,9例)、粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF,4例)和环磷酰胺+粒细胞集落刺激因子(CTX+G-CSF,8例)动员干细胞。17例行大剂量化疗(CVAP方案),其中2例加全身照射(TBI),3例为超大剂量化疗(CVB方案)。均于给药结束后48h回输分离细胞。1例单行全淋巴区照射(TLI)1次。结果:移植组21例中可评价的病人19例,其中完全缓解(CR)10例(53%),部分缓解(PR)7例(37%),稳定(SD)2例(10%)。1、2、3年实际生存率分别为44%(8/18)、27%(4/15)和25%(2/8)。无病生存者5例(7~49个月,中位生存32个月),1例CR者出院后2个月死于肺部感染,余均死于本病。疗效高于常规化疗组。骨髓抑制是主要的毒副作用,2例在化疗极期死于感染。超大剂量化疗组并发症较严重,骨髓恢复较慢。但全组绝大多数病人均安全度过骨髓抑制极期。结论:对于难治性恶性淋巴瘤,大剂量放、化疗结合APBSCT的疗效优于常规化疗。大剂量化疗的疗效似不低于超大剂量?Objective: Refractory malignant lymphomas are very difficult to be cured by conventional therapy. We hope to improve these patients′ survival by high dose radio chemotherapy. Methods: The peripheral blood stem cells were mobilized by dextran sulfate (DS, 9 cases) or G CSF (4 cases) or high dose cyclophosphamide(CTX) plus G CSF (8 cases). Leukapheresis products were stored at 4℃ (13 cases) or in liquid nitrogen with controlled rate freezing (8 cases). The chemotherapy regimens were (1) CTX 1.6 g/d1 and 1.4 g/d2, vindesine(VDS) 2~3 mg/d(d1,d2), doxorubicin(ADM) 40~50 mg/d(d1,d2), prednisone 100 mg/d(dd1-5) (17 cases). (2) carmustine(BCNU) 250 mg/d(dd1-3),etoposide (VP 16) 300~500 mg/d (dd2-6), CTX 1.6 g/d(dd6-7) or 1.3 g/d(dd6-8) (3 cases). CTX was substituted by melphalan 150 mg in 1 case with mild abnormality on ECG. (3) 1 case treated by TLI (D T 8 Gy/1F,d1). Leukapheresis products were re infused in 48 h after radio chemotherapies were completed. Control group: conventional therapy. Results: APBSCT group: in 19 evaluable cases, 10 were CR, 7 PR, 2 SD. The actuarial overall survivals (AOS) for 1,2 and 3 years were 44% (8/18), 27% (4/15) and 25% (2/8) respectively. There were 5 with desease free survival in 7~49 months (median 32 months). Control group: in 29 cases, there were 7 CR (24%), 8 PR (28%), 5 SD (17%), 8 PD (28%). 1 ,2 and 3 year AOS were 28% (7/25), 13% (2/15) and 9% (1/11) respectively. Conclusion: High dose radio chemotherapy combined with APBSCT is more effective than conventional therapy in treating refractory malignant lymphoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31