法律适用的裁判突袭——兼评《民事诉讼法》第179条第1款第10项再审事由  

On the Attacking Judgment of Legal Application

作　　者：梁开斌[1] 林占发 

机构地区：[1]福建工程学院法律系,福建福州350001 [2]泉州市中级人民检察院,福建泉州362000

出　　处：《华侨大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第2期81-86,共6页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(07BFX069)

摘　　要：法官可以对法律问题作积极地阐明,但是,当事人对法官适用法律的任何决定,都有权进行辩论,否则,就会造成法律适用的裁判突袭。出于防止突袭性裁判的需要,《民事诉讼法》第179条第1款第10项的解释与适用,应当涵盖裁判文书与辩论内容相脱节的情形。The judge may interpret the legal problems positively, but the parties have the right to debate for any legal dicision the judge adopts in a judgment, or the attacking judgment would be resulted in the legal application. For the purpose of preventing attacking judgment, the explanation and application of the article 179. 1.10 of Civil Procedural Law of China should include the situations that the judge deprives the debating right of the party.

关 键 词：突袭性裁判 阐明权 辩论权 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]