检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王小明[1] 孙卫东[1] 梁林虎[1] 方芳[1]
机构地区:[1]皖南医学院附属弋矶山医院普外科,安徽芜湖241001
出 处:《解剖与临床》2009年第3期192-194,共3页Anatomy and Clinics
摘 要:目的:探讨腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术的可行性。方法:2007年5月-2008年11月我院完成腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术8例,选取同期开腹手术8例,对其临床资料进行对照分析。结果:手术时间腹腔镜组长于开腹组(210min±56minvs160min±32min,P〈0.05);术中失血量、清扫淋巴结数目、术后并发症发生率两组间无统计学差异(P〉0.05);术后肠蠕动恢复时间、镇痛时间及术后住院时间腹腔镜组分别为(2.3±0.8)d、(1.7±0.7)d、(8.8±1.1)d,开腹组分别为(3.4±0.9)d、(2.4±0.6)d、(10.2±1.2)d,腹腔镜组短于开腹组(P〈0.05);两组术后随访均未出现穿刺孔或切口种植转移。结论:腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术安全可行,疗效可靠;与开放手术相比,具有创伤小、微创、疗效好等优势。Objective:To explore the feasibility of laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer. Methods:From May. 2007 to Nov. 2008, laparoscopic radical resection of colorectal cancer was performed on 8 patients. Other 8 cases who underwent laparotomy during the same period served as control group. Their clinical data was collected and analyzed. Results:The operative time in the laparoscope group (LG) was longer than that in the open group(OG) ( 210 min ± 56 min vs. 160 min ± 32 rain, P 〈 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, lymphatic node dissection and postoperative complications between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). The patients in LG enjoyed faster gastro-intestinal function recovery (2.3 d ± 0.8 d vs. 3.4 d ± 0.9 d, P 〈 0.05), less need for postoperative analgesics ( 1.7 d ± 0.7 d vs. 2.4 d ± 0.6 d, P 〈 0.05 ) and shorter length of stay (8.8 d ± 1.1 d vs. 10.2 d ± 1.2 d, P 〈 0.05). There were not port-size or incision implantation metastasis in the two groups during the followed-up period. Conclusions:The laparoscopic radical resection is effective, feasible and safe, which has advantages of mininal injury and good results.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222