社会研究的唯科学主义批判及其归宿——哈耶克政治哲学方法论研究  

Critique on Scientism of Social Science and Its End——An Enquiry into Hayek's Methodology of Political Philosophy

作　　者：罗秋立[1] 

机构地区：[1]韩山师范学院政法系,广东潮州521041

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2009年第6期7-12,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究2007年度青年基金项目"当代西方政治哲学方法论研究"(07JC720015)的系列成果之一

摘　　要：唯科学主义方法论把自然科学的法则直接运用到人类社会历史的研究中,这造成了对理性的滥用,也使社会科学研究误入歧途。哈耶克企图以其康德主义路向的先验方法论来批判唯科学主义方法论,从而达到对理性辩护的目的,但是他却以失败告终。哈耶克的失败并不在于他自身的理性主义立场,而在于他的方法论的形而上学性与神秘性。历史唯物主义以其现实的历史性原则,不但实现了对方法论的唯科学主义与先验主义的批判,而且为社会研究确立了新的方法论原则。Methodological scientism is that the rules of natural science is applied directly to the research of social science, which not only abuse human rationality but also mislead social science into false. In order to defense human reason , Hayek tried to criticize methodological scientism by his Kantian transcendental methodology. However, he failed. In our opinions, Hayek＇s failure should be attributed to the characteristics of his methodology instead of his position of rationalism. With the Principle of reality, historical materialism not only realizes its criticism on meth- odological scientism and transcendentalism, but also establishes a new methodology for social science.

关 键 词：唯科学主义 方法论 哈耶克 历史唯物主义 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]