治安管理处罚法与刑法竞合之研究  

Study of the Concurrence between Security Administration Punishment Act and Criminal Law

作　　者：张淑平[1] 裴兆斌[2] 

机构地区：[1]福建警察学院治安系,福建福州350007 [2]辽宁省公安厅治安总队,辽宁沈阳110031

出　　处：《福建警察学院学报》2009年第3期57-63,共7页Journal of Fujian Police College

基　　金：2006年福建省社科项目"<治安管理处罚法>实施问题研究"的阶段性成果(项目编号:2006B2003)

摘　　要：发生在刑法和治安管理处罚法之间的法条竞合虽由来已久,但因属不同法律之间的特殊法条竞合,尚未有现成的立法或者理论上成熟的适用规则,造成长期以来执法、司法实践的随意甚至混乱。两法具有的天然的渊源关系和我国立法既定性又定量的传统方法是导致两法竞合的原因。刑法是所有法律的保障法,刑罚是所有法律制裁的最后手段,两法出现竞合时,应当优先适用治安管理处罚法,只有在行为的社会危害性已经达到应受刑罚处罚的程度,才能适用刑法。但是解决两法竞合问题最根本的对策和最可行的办法是最高司法机关出台司法解释,根据不同的罪量要素,明确罪与非罪的界限。The concurrence between Security Administration Punishment Act and Criminal Law has existed for a long time, but there has not been a mature application rule because they belong to different laws, which results in chaos of the judicial enforcement and practice. The natural historic relationship be- tween them and Chinese traditional qualitative and quantitative legislation is the cause of their concurrence. Criminal Law is the guarantee law of all the other laws, while Security Administration Punishment Act is the last choice of legal sanction. When there is a concurrence, Security Administration Punishment Act should take the priority; Criminal Law is applicable only when a behavior is so harmful that it should be so punished. However, the fundamental countermeasure and the most feasible method are to release the judicial interpretation by supreme judicial organ, making clear the distinction between being criminal or not, according to factors constituting the quantity of a crime.

关 键 词：治安管理处罚法 刑法 竞合 

分 类 号：DF3[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]