检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《国际医药卫生导报》2009年第12期100-102,共3页International Medicine and Health Guidance News
摘 要:目的探索预防术中缝针丢失的新方法。方法(1)普通缝针:①对照组:采用盲法,连续行接触放针法、夹持缝针抛掷法、夹持缝针法,操作1200次。②实验组:增加器械托盘的缓冲作用,与对照组做相同的操作1200次。(2)无损伤带线缝合针保管:采用针盒法及改良法实验操作各180次。结果(1)对照组发生弹针率为0.75%;实验组弹针率为O,两组实验比较差异有显著意义(P〈0.01)。(2)对照组失针率为17.22%;实验组失针率为0,两组实验比较差异有显著意义(P〈0.01)。结论对普通缝针增加器械托盘的缓冲作用、对无损伤带线缝合针采用改良法保管,在预防术中缝针丢失的方法中作用明显,且价格低廉,取材方便。Objective To explore a new method of preventing the suture-needle lost during operation. Methods (1) General suture needle: tangent needles, flight suture and clip suture were manipulated continuously 1200 times in control group; same manipulating was performed as control group and cushioning effect of appliance salver was added in experiment group. (2) Scatheless suture-needle with string safekeeping: Experiments of needle box method and improved method are performed 180 times respectively. Results (1) The shells-pin rate in control group was 0.75%; while that of experimental group was 0%. The difference between the two groups was significant (P〈0.01). (2) The lost-pin rate in control group was 17.22%, and that of experimental group was 0%. The experimental difference between the two groups was significant (P〈 0.01). Conclusions The cushioning effect of appliance salver and scatheless suture with string safekeeping will be a significant inexpensive and easy method in preventing the suture lost.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198