检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘东辉[1] 田晓岩[1] 朱兆川[1] 高艳宇[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省医院口腔科,黑龙江哈尔滨150036
出 处:《黑龙江医学》2009年第6期434-435,共2页Heilongjiang Medical Journal
摘 要:目的探讨两种窝沟封闭术预防窝沟龋的临床疗效。方法选择55例6~8岁儿童的第1恒磨牙用自身半口对照法,观察并比较窝沟釉质成形封闭术和普通封闭术封闭剂的保留率和龋病发生率。结果随诊3年,发现窝沟釉质成形封闭术组保存率在封闭后1年与普通窝沟封闭术组无显著差异;而在2~3年有显著性差异(P<0.05),且龋病发生率有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论窝沟釉质成形封闭术能明显提高封闭剂保留率,从而增强防龋效果。Objective To discuss the curative effect of two kinds of pit closure and prevention of pit caries. Methods 55 cases of such patient age from 6 ~ 8 year old were analyzed in first molar and comparison with opposite side. The in- cidence of caries ad impacting medium remained rate were observed with enamel closure and common closure. Results After 3 years follow - up, there was significant difference between two groups in remaining rate of closure and lower caries incidence. Conclusion The enamel pit closure might improve the remaining rate and prevent caries happening.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.244.172