制度的借鉴与创制——“法庭之友”与专家法律意见  

The Reference and Establishment of the Institution ——"Amicus curiae" and legal expert advice system

作　　者：邱星美[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《河北法学》2009年第8期153-159,共7页Hebei Law Science

摘　　要："法庭之友"制度有助于法庭作出符合社会公正价值愿望的裁判,提升司法民主化,已成为英美对抗制诉讼文化不可或缺的重要组成部分。中国不存在与其完全相同的对应物,但是中国司法民主化的其他形式历来有之,近年来流行的法律专家论证意见书与美国"法庭之友"书状在制度价值、论证内容、法律地位等方面具有共同性,我们应当借鉴"法庭之友"制度的成功经验,将我国专家法律意见制度规范化。The ＂Amicus curiae＂ system has become an indispensable element for the adversarial system of litigation culture in Britain and the U. S. Because it can help the court form judgments in line with social justice and enhance the democratization of the administration of justice. Even though the identical counterpart of the amicus curiae does not exist in China for the time being, the root of other forms of judicial democratization runs deep. Since the recently appeared demonstration submission shares great commonality with the amicus curiae in terms of the point system, its legal status, the contents of argumentation and so forth, we should build our own legal expert advice system based on the achievement of the amicus curiae.

关 键 词：对抗制 “法庭之友” 专家法律意见书 

分 类 号：DF72[政治法律—诉讼法学]