检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广州市花都区中医院康复科,广东510800 [2]清远市中医院康复科,广东511500
出 处:《上海针灸杂志》2009年第6期339-340,共2页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的观察平衡针配合运动疗法治疗落枕临床疗效。方法应用平衡针配合运动疗法治疗急性落枕96例,与同期采用以传统针刺为主治疗的82例进行比较,观察其疗程与疗效。结果治疗组愈显率为94.8%,对照组愈显率为84.1%,两组疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组疗程比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论平衡针疗法治疗落枕优于传统针刺疗法,且疗程短,减少了患者的痛苦。Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of balancing acupuncture plus kinesitherapy in treating stiff neck. Methods Ninety-six patients with acute stiff neck were treated with balancing acupuncture. The therapeutic effect was compared with that in 82 patients treated with conventional acupuncture at the same time. The courses of treatment were also compare between them. Results The cure and marked efficacy rate was 94.8% in the treatment group and 84.1% in the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in therapeutic effect between the two groups (P〈0.05). There was also a statistically significant difference in treatment course between the two groups (P〈O.O1). Conclusion Balancing acupuncture is superior to conventional acupuncture in treating stiff neck. Its short course of treatment reduces the patients' pain.
分 类 号:R246.2[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222