迷狂与理性——“卡塔西斯”意义新解  

Ravishing and Reason——A New Interpretation of "Catharsis"

作　　者：王涛[1] 曹祥金[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东大学文艺美学研究中心,山东济南250100

出　　处：《廊坊师范学院学报（社会科学版）》2009年第3期20-22,共3页Journal of Langfang Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：追溯悲剧的起源,变换从前学界所遵循的宗教学和医学角度,在酒神和日神背景下,可以发现朱光潜和罗念生的两种学说不仅不相互排斥而且具有前后一致的连贯性。酒神精神和日神精神始终贯穿在悲剧的发展过程之中,它们不仅主导了希腊悲剧审美特色而且左右了观众的心理。When tracing the origin of tragedy, we can use the Dionysian spirit and Apollonian spirit as an alternative to the perspectives of religion and medicine originally followed by academicians. From this perspective, continuity, instead of contradictions will be found between Zhu Guangquan＇s and Luo Niansheng＇s opinions. As an inherent part of the development of tragedy, the Dionysian spirit and Apollonian spirit not only play an important role in the aesthetic features of Greek tragedy but have a power over the audience＇ s psychology.

关 键 词：日神 酒神 悲剧 适度 

分 类 号：I0[文学—文学理论]