检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]深圳市第四人民医院,518033
出 处:《中国现代药物应用》2009年第13期13-15,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
摘 要:目的观察比较健择联合卡铂、长春瑞滨(GCN方案)与健择联合长春瑞滨(GN方案)治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和毒副反应。方法68例晚期NSCLC患者随机分成GCN方案组38例及GN方案组30例。每例至少治疗两个周期。结果GCN组及GN组有效率分别为52.6%及26.7%(P<0.05),中位疾病进度时间分别为9个月及4个月。中位生存期分别为15个月及9个月。毒副反应以骨髓抑制为主,GCN组略高(P>0.05),胃肠道反应轻微。结论GCN方案治疗NSCLC近期疗效略高于GN方案,毒性反应可耐受。Objective Observation and comparison of treatment effect and toxicity reaction between GCN progranune (Gemcitabine combined with Carboplatin and Vinorelbine Bitatrate ) and GN programme (Gemcitabine combined with Vinorelbine Bitatrate) in treatment of advanced None-small cell lung cancer. Methods 68 patients of None-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is divided into GCN section ( 38 cases) and GN section (30 cases) randomly. Each patient will be treated at least for 2 cycles. Result The effective rate of GCN section and GN section is 52. 6% and 26. 7% respectively (P 〈 0.05 ) while ITP is 9 months and 4 months respectively, MST (median survival time) is 15 months and 9 months respectively as well. Main toxicity reaction is slightly more observed as myelosuppression in GCN section (P 〉 0. 05 ), mild gastrointestinal reaction is also found in both sections. Conclusion Short-term effect to NSCLC by GCN is slightly higher than that of CN, and toxicity reaction is tolerated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.175