实质刑法解释合理实现的程序性论证规则  

Procedural Comments:A Proper Guarantee for Substantive Interpretation of Criminal Law

作　　者：苏彩霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学刑事司法学院,湖北武汉430073

出　　处：《现代法学》2009年第4期104-114,共11页Modern Law Science

基　　金：教育部2006年人文社会科学基金项目"实质的刑法解释论研究"(06JC820016);国家社科基金项目2004年度--般项目"中国刑法本土化;国际化争论背景下的社会危害性理论"(04BFX048)

摘　　要：刑法解释是研究中国刑事法治形成的重要题域。以程序与议论为双轨的实质刑法解释论是超越主观主义解释论与客观主义解释论之争的第三条道路,它通过程序与议论、对话与论证在交谈意义的合理性上来实现刑法价值判断的客观性。取消最高人民检察院有权刑法解释主体的地位,废除《刑法》第306条规定的辩护人、诉讼代理人毁灭证据、伪造证据、妨害作证罪,取消法官错案追究制,建立判决书说理制度,都是围绕如何构造一个平等、自由、不受强制的议论场域而设计的程序规则,以保障实质刑法解释的合理实现。Interpretation of criminal law is of great importance in studying the development of rule of law in China＇s criminal law areas. The substantive interpretation based on procedures and comments is deemed a third way apart from the contention of the subjective interpretation and the objective interpretation. It ensures the objectivity of value judgment in criminal law to be achieved on the basis of ＂discourse-sensed legitimacy＂ of procedure and comments, and discussion and argument. In order to make the comment equal, free and out of compulsion and ensure realization of substantive interpretation of criminal law, measures should be taken such as excluding the Supreme People＇s Procuratorate from interpreting criminal law, abrogating spoliation, forgery of evidence and obstruction of testifying of the defense or the counsel provided in Article 306 of the Criminal Act, revoking judge＇ s liability for misjudged cases and establishing ratio dicidendi regime.

关 键 词：刑法价值判断 刑法解释 错案追究制 判决书说理 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学] G212[政治法律—法学]