如何建立我国鉴定结论采纳规则——以美国专家证言判断标准为参照  

How to Make the Rules of Admissibility of Expert Opinions in China:From the Perspective of American Criteria of Admissibility of Expert Testimonies

作　　者：刘晓丹[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100097

出　　处：《现代法学》2009年第4期187-193,共7页Modern Law Science

基　　金：2006年教育部哲学社会科学重大攻关项目证"据科学的理论体系与应用研究"(062JB0011)子课题

摘　　要：在我国司法实践中法官不够重视对鉴定结论的可靠性进行实质审查。美国专家证言采纳规则的先进性启示我们有必要对我国鉴定结论的审查认证进行反思。确立我国鉴定结论的采纳规则,尤其是确立鉴定结论可靠性的采纳规则,有助于防止某些伪科学进入法庭,防止法官滥用自由裁量权,从而对正确认证鉴定结论起到积极的推动作用。In China, few judges hold a substantive examination of the reliability of expert opinions. The sophistication of American rules of admissibility of expert testimonies now urges us that it is not unnecessary to reconsider the examination and certification of expert opinions in China. To build up a framework to examine expert opinions, especially to lay down the rules to certify the reliability of opinions, is conducive both to preventing pseudoscience from access to justice and preventing a judge from abuse of discretion. Thus judges may be positively encouraged to examine and certify expert opinions appropriately.

关 键 词：鉴定结论 专家证言 可靠性 采纳规则 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学] F832.4[政治法律—法学]