检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东技术师范学院教育学院,广州510665 [2]华南师范大学教育科学学院,广州510631
出 处:《心理发展与教育》2009年第3期46-53,共8页Psychological Development and Education
基 金:广东省哲社规划心理学研究项目(编号05SXY005)
摘 要:在矛盾式与潜藏式两类情境中,用出声思维的方法考察大学生问题发现过程的表征层次特点。40名大学生参与实验,高低分组被试各20名。研究结果显示:(1)高分组大学生在问题总数量和核心问题数量上高于低分组,矛盾式情境中发现的问题数量和质量均高于潜藏式情境。(2)充分的表征是发现高质量问题的基础;联系性表征对问题发现有积极影响,但目的性表征对问题发现有负面作用;潜藏式情境的问题发现更需要借助内部信息表征。(3)各类表征层次出现的先后顺序存在差异,高低分组大学生遵循同样的表征次序。The representational level in the process of situations by means of thinking aloud. 40 undergraduat problem finding were investigated in contradictory and potential es attended the experiment. Half of them were high-score students and the rest were low-score students. The results showed, (1)high-score students found problems and key problems more than low-score students. Problems in contradictory situatoin were more than problems in potential situation. (2) High quality problems were based on the adequate representations. The contact representations were good to prblem finding , but the objective representation was bad to problem finding. It need more representations of information in mind in potential situation than in contradictory situatoin. (3) The order of representations were different. High-score students and low-score students followed the same order.
关 键 词:问题发现 表征层次 矛盾式情境 潜藏式情境 出声思维
分 类 号:B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.143