检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韦波[1] 唐峥华[1] 苏莉[2] 凌小凤[3] 李贞[1]
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学,南宁530021 [2]广西壮族自治区疾病预防控制中心 [3]山西省太原市疾病预防控制中心
出 处:《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》2009年第7期660-664,共5页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基 金:世行贷款项目资助(2004-GXXMB-CS-003)
摘 要:目的对症状自评量表(SCL-90)在壮族农民中应用的信度和效度进行检验,并建立壮族农民SCL-90常模。方法采用多阶段分层整群系统抽样方法进行抽样,使用SCL-90对样本人群进行测评,共获有效问卷921份。结果SCL-90的同质性信度为0.971,分半信度为0.930。SCL-90的内容效度与结构效度也达到了可接受的水平。壮族农民的SCL-90总分为(136.34±39.91)分,阳性项目数为(31.094-22.03)分,各因子分均值为1.35—1.67。除敌对、偏执因子外,壮族农民与1986年全国常模在SCL-90其余7个因子及总分上的差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05),且除人际敏感因子外,其余6个因子分均高于全国常模。结论本研究结果可作为评价壮族农民心理健康状况的SCL-90常模。Objective To test the reliability, validity of Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) in Zhuang peasants and establish a norm. Methods By means of many phases stratified cluster system sampling, SCL-90 was applied to 92t Zhuang peasants. Results 1 ) The split-half reliabilities was O. 9305 and the Crobach alphas was 0. 971, and the reliability of SCL-90 was acceptable. 2) In the group of Zhuang peasants , the total score of SCL-90 was 136.34±39.91, the positive items 31.09 ±22.03, and the mean factorial score 1.35 - 1.67. Compared to the norms of Chinese in 1986, except the factors of hostility and paranoid ideation, all the other 7 factors had significant difference (P 〈 0.05 ) , in which interpersonal sensitivity factor was lower than the norms and the other 6 factors were higher than the norms. Conclusion The study establishes the norms of Zhuang peasants.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.217.244.16