太极扣精密附着体修复KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损的咀嚼效能评价  

The Evaluation of Masticatory Efficiency of Stern ERA Attachment in the Restoration of KennedyⅡ Dentition Defect

作　　者：沈乃波[1] 潘联力[1] 

机构地区：[1]济钢集团总公司总医院口腔科,山东济南250000

出　　处：《菏泽医学专科学校学报》2009年第2期1-3,共3页Journal of Heze Medical College

摘　　要：目的分析评价太极扣精密附着体(ERA)修复KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损病例后的咀嚼效能。方法选择符合条件的KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损患者65例,随机分为观察组(36例)和对照组(29例),采用太极扣精密附着体为观察组制作太极扣精密附着体义齿,对照组采用普通可摘义齿修复。两组均采用吸光度法分别测定初戴即刻、1个月、3个月后的咀嚼效能。结果观察组吸光度平均值0.85、0.89、0.97;对照组0.73、0.74、0.71,两组比较,结果具有统计学差异(P<0.01),且观察组咀嚼效能在各时间点均高于对照组。结论ERA附着体可摘义齿对KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损的修复比普通可摘义齿修复后具有更好的咀嚼效能。Objective To analyze the masticatory efficiency after the ERA repaired Kennedy Ⅱ dentition defect. Methods Selected 65 patients who were in line with Kennedy Ⅱ dentition defect, divided into the observation group （ 36 patients ） and the control group （ 29 patients ）, the observation group adopted ERA, the control group adopted ordinary removable partial denture. Both groups were determined mastieatory efficiency about aetioweared, lmonth and 3month by spectrophotometry . Results The average absorbance of the observation group was 0.85,0.89,0.97; and that of the control group 0. 73,0. 74,0. 71. Two sets compared, there was a significant difference （ P〈 0.01）, the masticatory efficiency of the observation group was higher than the control group. Conclusions The mastoratory efficiency of Kennedy Ⅱ dentition defect after ERA restoration is better than ordinary removable partial denture.

关 键 词：太极扣精密附着体/治疗应用 KennedyⅡ类牙列缺损/治疗 咀嚼效能 

分 类 号：R783.4[医药卫生—口腔医学] R783.6[医药卫生—临床医学]