检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦越存[1]
出 处:《伦理学研究》2009年第4期10-14,共5页Studies in Ethics
基 金:浙江省教育厅一般项目"美德伦理的现代意义研究"(项目编号Y200803615)
摘 要:现代西方伦理危机的实质是道德个体主义与道德共识的冲突。如何解决这一矛盾已成为解决现代西方伦理危机的核心课题。对此,西方新旧自由主义和共同体主义都给出了较具代表性的回答。然而,要真正解决问题还应到马克思的实践哲学中寻找答案。在马克思实践哲学的视域内,道德个体主义与道德共识的冲突源于人本体论存在的矛盾,这种矛盾只有在现实的实践活动中才能解决。所以,实践哲学进路是解决现代西方伦理危机的现实之路.The substance of modern western moral crisis is the conflict between moral individualism and moral consensus. How to resolve this contradiction has got to the core of the project to the modern western moral crisis. As a reply, the new and old Liberalism and Communitarianism of west have given answers with some representativeness. However, this article holds that in order to settle the problem, one must turn to Marx's practical philosophy. From Marx's view, the conflict between moral individualism and moral consensus stems from contradictions of the biological ontology of human being, which can only be resolved in the processes of practical activity. Therefore, a way of practical philosophy is a real one to resolve the modern western moral crisis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3