检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王录琦[1]
出 处:《科学决策》2009年第7期14-23,89,共11页Scientific Decision Making
摘 要:本文选取A股、H股同时上市的公司股票价格数据为样本,采用Granger因果检验和信息份额模型,实证检验了股权分置改革前后A股、H股价格发现的动态演化过程。Granger因果检验表明,股改后H股更多地引导A股;信息份额模型显示,股改前,A股市场在股票价格的形成中占有一定的优势,股改后,H股市场在股票价格的形成中的优势逐渐明显。实证结果表明,股改后A股市场与成熟资本市场正逐步接轨,A股市场与H股市场的关联性得到进一步加强。This paper have adopted Granger causality analysis method and information shares model based on the A and H stock price of dual - listed companies, compared A and H markets' price discovery mechanism before and after the share desegregation reform. Much importance is attached on the application of information shares model for quantitative analysis. The empirical results of Granger causality analysis method shows that, after the reform, the prices of H shares have more effect on A shares price while the empirical results of information shares model shows that, before the reform, A shares market has more leadership in the stock price formation process, while after the reform, H shares market' s leadership have become more and more obvious. The study showed that, A shares market has become more and more mature after reform, and the A and H shares markets has become more and more interdependent.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249