检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学 [2]北京师范大学高等教育研究所
出 处:《教育研究》2009年第7期14-21,共8页Educational Research
基 金:教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目“中国现阶段高等教育大众化过程中的重大问题与对策研究”(项目批准号:04JZD0023)的研究成果之一
摘 要:通过对近三年教育类核心期刊中涉及高等教育的论文的研究方法、研究领域等情况进行的量化分析显示,我国高等教育研究具有研究领域广泛、问题意识凸显、微观应用研究得到重视、国际比较研究活跃等特点,同时存在政策研究和实证研究薄弱、院校研究较少、比较研究针对性和本土化较差等不足。为此,高等教育研究应创新研究方法,加强实证研究、微观应用研究和基础理论研究,规范政策性研究,增强比较研究的针对性和本土化,以促进高等教育学科建设,更好服务于高等教育改革与发展。By applying quantitative analysis toward the papers selected from core journals of higher education in the recent three years, which concerned research methods, research areas, etc. , it is found out that Chinese higher education research is characterized by increasingly comprehensive research domain, more problem and question consciousness, more regards paid to micro-applying studies, and international comparative research flourishing. Also, there are still some problems to be settled, such as the deficiency of policy study and quantitative study, fewer studies on university and college, scarcity of the localization of international comparative research, etc. Based on the above, higher education should innovate research methods, reinforce the demonstrative study, micro-applying study and basic theoretical study, and improve policy study, strengthen the localization and pertinence of comparative research, so as to promote the construction of higher education as a subject, to better serve the reform and development of higher education.
分 类 号:G644[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15