检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴君仓[1] 群森[1] 张持[1] 赵昊[1] 郭茜[1] 徐文安[1] 刘祖欣[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽省合肥市第二人民医院神经内科,230011
出 处:《中华全科医学》2009年第9期913-914,共2页Chinese Journal of General Practice
基 金:安徽省合肥市科技局重点科研课题(2007-1007)号
摘 要:目的探讨微创血肿清除术对高血压性脑出血(HICH、30~80ml)病死率的影响。方法回顾性分析符合入选标准的高血压性脑出血患者136例(微创组67例,对照组69例),对两组患者病死率进行对照研究。结果①微创组死亡6例,病死率为8.9%,对照组死亡20例,病死率为28.9%(χ2=4.348,P=0.034),差异有统计学意义。②比较微创组和对照组死亡原因时,死于单纯脑疝的分别是33.3%和70.0%(χ2=4.803,P=0.025),差异有统计学意义。结论微创血肿清除术治疗高血压性脑出血能降低患者的病死率,是治疗高血压性脑出血较为理想的手术方法。Objective To investigate the impact of mini-invasive evacuation of hematoma on mortality of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage (HICH ,30-80ml). Methods 67 patients with HICH (surgical group)were treated with micro-invasive evacuation of hematoma, and 69 patients (control group)that matched with the surgical group in age, GCS, position and volume of intra-cerebral hematoma were treated with drug therapy only. The mortality of the two groups were analyzed. Results The difference of mortality between two groups was significant ( 8.9% vs 28.9% , χ2 = 4. 348, P = 0.034 ). The difference of the reason of dying from single cerebral hernia between two groups was significant ( 33.3% vs 70, 0%, χ2 = 4.803,P = 0. 025 ). Conclusion Micro-invasive evacuation of hematoma was an ideal surgical therapy to treat patients with HICH.
关 键 词:高血压脑出血(HICH) 微创血肿清除术 病死率
分 类 号:R743.34[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158