我国与美国司法ADR的比较研究——兼论对构建我国多元化纠纷解决机制的启示  

Comparative study on judicial ADR between America and our country——Double discussion on the inspiration for constructing diversity dispute resolution mechanism in our country

作　　者：敖妙[1] 

机构地区：[1]沈阳工程学院政治法律系,沈阳110136

出　　处：《沈阳工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2009年第3期350-353,共4页Journal of Shenyang Institute of Engineering:Social Science

摘　　要：司法ADR是一种替代性纠纷解决机制,它能够降低诉讼成本,提高诉讼效率,节约司法资源。通过对美国与我国司法ADR的特点、类型和运行的介绍和比较,结合我国国情和法院审判实际,以求借鉴,从司法ADR的适用范围、人员选任和配套制度等方面提出建议,以推进我国多元化纠纷解决机制的构建,为建设和谐社会提供理论支持。Judicial ADR is a kind of alternative dispute resolution mechanism, can reduce the litigation cost, improve the efficiency of lawsuit, and save judicial resources. By introducing and comparing the characteristics, types and operation of judicial ADR between American and our country,combining our country＇s situation and judgement practice, wants to use for reference. From the aspects of application scope, personnel selection and court judgement system puts forward the suggestions, so as to promote the construction of diversity dispute resolution mechanism in our country, and offer theoretical support for harmonious society construction.

关 键 词：ADR 调解 比较研究 

分 类 号：D915.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]