检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华中科技大学经济学院
出 处:《管理学报》2009年第8期1098-1103,共6页Chinese Journal of Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70803013)
摘 要:利用改进的BB法则划分股市的波动周期,运用EGARCH-GED模型比较研究了上海和香港股票市场的非对称性问题。通过研究发现,上证综指的收益分布从长期来看呈负偏,而恒生指数呈正偏;在熊市中两个市场均存在"杠杆效应",在牛市中香港市场坏消息的影响仍然更大,而上海市场则存在"反杠杆效应"。出现这一差异主要由于上海证券市场缺乏卖空机制,影响了价格对坏消息的吸收,这一结果能够解释我国内地股市"暴涨暴跌"的现象。This paper examines the asymmetry problems of Shanghai and Hongkong stock markets with EGARCH-GED model and divides the volatility cycles by use of BB law. We find out that the return distribution of the SHCI is negatively skewed, but that of the HSI is positively skewed. The empirical results show that whether in Shanghai or Hong Kong, bad news has greater impact on market activities than good news in the bear market. But in the bull market, there is "leverage" effect in Hong Kong and there is "anti-leverage" effect in Shanghai. The differences arise mainly because of the lack of short-selling mechanism in the Shanghai securities market, which affects the absorbing of price to bad news and explains the drastic rising and slumping in the mainland stock markets.
关 键 词:卖空限制 EGARCH—GED模型 非对称性
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15