机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属第三人民医院神经外科,上海交通大学医学院创伤医学研究所,201900上海 [2]复旦大学上海医学院解剖与组织胚胎学系
出 处:《中华急诊医学杂志》2009年第8期841-845,共5页Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基 金:上海市教委自然科学基金重点项目(04BB23,07ZZ42)
摘 要:目的探讨移植hBDNF-GFP基因转染神经干细胞后对视神经损伤大鼠视网膜BDNF表达的影响。方法①78只SD大鼠随机分为正常对照组(n=6)、视神经夹伤组(n=72)。视神经夹伤组动物行右侧视神经夹伤后随机平均分为三个亚组:分别于玻璃体腔内注射0.01mol/LPBS(PBS组),GFP基因转染神经干细胞(GFP-NSCs组)和hBDNF-GFP基因转染神经干细胞(hBDNF-GFP-NSCs组)。各组动物单纯暴露左侧视神经作为假损伤组。分别于移植后3d,7d,14d和28d处死动物取视网膜,ELISA法检测各组视网膜中BDNF含量。②另取6只视神经损伤大鼠移植hBDNF-GmNscs,分别于2周、4周和8周各处死2只大鼠,取眼球做冰冻切片观察移植细胞存活、迁移情况。③35只SD大鼠随机分为4组:正常对照组(n=5)、右眼视神经损伤NSCs治疗组(n=10)、GFP-NSCs治疗组(n:10)及hBDNF-GFP-NSCs治疗组(n=10)。④各组于术后4周和8周分别处死5只大鼠,Western-blot法检测视网膜组织中BDNF表达。结果①ELISA结果显示,正常对照组BDNF含量与假损伤组间比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),移植手术后第3天时,三个损伤亚组视网膜匀浆上清中hBDNF含量明显增加(与假损伤组比较P〈0.05),而三组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);7d时,GFP-NSCs组与假损伤组比较差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05),而PBS组、hBDNF-GFP-NSCs组与假损伤组比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),PBS组与GFP-NSCs组间及hBDNF-GFP-NSCs组与GFP-NSCs组间差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05);移植第14天和28天时,PBS组和GFP-NSCs组中视网膜BDNF含量降低,而hBDNF-GFP-NSCs组中BDNF含量与其他三组比较明显升高,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。②冰冻切片示移植后,hRDNF-GFP-Nscs可在宿主视网膜内存活,并逐渐迁移至视网膜各层。③Western-blot检测显示,各组内第4周和第8周BDNF表达�Objective To investigate the effects of human Rrain-derived neurotrophic factor-gamma fetoprotein (hBDNF-GFP) gene-transfected neural stem cell (NSC) transplantation on BDNF expressions in the retina of rats after optic nerve (ON) crush injury. Method ①Seventy-eight Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were randomly assigned into a control group ( n =6) and ON crush group ( n = 72). In the ON crush group, the right ON was crushed while the left NO was exposed as sham injury. Rats in the ON crush group were divided into three subgroups:PBS group (intravitreous injection of 0.01 mol/L phosphate buffered solution); GFP group (intravitreous transplantation of GFP gene-transfected NSCs) ; and hBDNF-GFP group (intravitreous transplantation of hBDNF-GFP gene-transfected NSCs). Rats were sacrificed 3, 7, 14 and 28 days after transplantation, and BDNF expressions in retinal homogenates was detected by using enzyme-linked imrnanosorbent assay (ELISA).②The hBDNF- GFP-NSCs were transplanted intravitreous into six rats after ON crush injury. Following this, two rats were sacririced 2, 4 and 8 weeks after transplantation. The survival and location of NSCs in host retina were observed by frozen section analysis.③Adult SD rats were randomly divided into four groups: control group (n = 5); NSC group (NSC transplantation, n = 10); GFP-NSC group (GFP-NSC transplantation, n = 10); and hBDNF-GFP- NSC group (hBDNF-GFP-NSC transplantation, n = 10). Four and eight weeks after transplantation, five rats from every group were sacrificed. Western blot analysis was used to determine retinal BDNF expression. Results ① There was no significant difference in BDNF expression between the control group arid shanvinjury groups ( P 〉 0.05). Three days after NSC transplantation, BDNF expression increased significantly in the three injured subgroups compared with the sham-injury group, ( P 〈 0.05), whereas no significant inter-group differences in BDNF expressions among three injured
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...