检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张萍[1]
出 处:《行政与法》2009年第8期93-97,共5页Administration and Law
摘 要:公益行政案件的司法救济问题近年来在理论界广受关注,但司法实践中一直未能解决。究其原因主要在于当前立法的不完善:一方面现行法律对于何为公益行政诉讼没有明确界定,另一方面对于由谁来启动公益行政诉讼更是不曾提及。本文旨在指出我国现行立法中行政诉讼原告资格制度的缺陷及其对建立公益行政诉讼制度所造成的影响,同时对西方国家在公益行政诉讼原告资格制度方面的成熟经验加以分析,并在此基础上提出构建我国公益行政诉讼原告资格制度的几点建议。In recent years,jurists have focused wide concerns on the problem of remedies to administrative litigations,which has not been resolved yet in judicial practice and could be attributed mainly to the defects of the present legislation:the current law does not clearly define what administrative litigation for public interests is,nor provides who is entitled to launch it.This treatise deals with those defects aforesaid and their negative influences on the establishment of the system of administrative litigation for public interests,analyzes the West's successful corresponding experiences and then makes some proposals for the construction of our country's system of the qualification as complainant to administrative litigation for public-interests.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145