两种随机点立体视检查法在临床应用比较  被引量:2

The application comparison of two kinds of random-dot stereopsis inspection methods in clinical work

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:杨小梅[1] 胡雪篱[1] 郎卫华[2] 左芸[1] 师文[1] 

机构地区:[1]云南省妇幼保健院眼科,云南昆明650051 [2]沧州市中心医院眼科,河北沧州061001

出  处:《中国实用眼科杂志》2009年第8期875-876,共2页Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology

摘  要:目的比较两种随机点立体视检查方法的差异。方法选用颜少明等联合研制的《立体视觉检查图》与金贵昌等联合研制的《双眼立体视觉检查图》,对一组5~7岁的儿童,在视力、眼位正常的前提下,在相同的环境中进行立体视锐度的检查。结果共检查128人,对两种检查方法的结果进行配对t检验,其结果差异有统计学意义(t=12.49,P〈0.01)。结论在应用两种随机点立体图进行近立体视锐度的检查中。Objective To compare the difference of two kinds of random-dot stereopsis inspection methods. Methods Using the "Stereovision Inspection graph" which was developed by Yan Shao-ming and the "Binocular Stereovision Inspection graph" which was developed by Jin Gui-chang, the stereopsis acuity examination was performed to a group of 5-7 year-old children whose vision and the eye position were normal under the same environment. Results Two groups of 128 children were examined using two kinds of inspection methods and the matching t-test was done to the results. There were statistical significant differences between two groups ( t =12.49, P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusions Two different stereovision inspection graphs used in this study to examine the children's stereopsis acuity showed significant differences between two testing results.

关 键 词:随机点立体视 检查方法 比较 

分 类 号:R778[医药卫生—眼科] R339.146[医药卫生—临床医学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象