检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽省芜湖市宣城地区人民医院妇产科,241000
出 处:《中华全科医学》2009年第10期1064-1065,共2页Chinese Journal of General Practice
摘 要:目的评价液基细胞学(thinprep cytology test,TCT)薄片制片对宫颈病变筛查的准确性。方法采用TCT制片及传统宫颈细胞涂片法分别对2186例、2219例受检者进行宫颈癌筛查。结果TCT薄片法和传统巴氏涂片法对低度鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL)以上病变的检出率分别为4.35%、1.67%,两者结果差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论ThinPrep液基细胞学检查敏感性明显高于传统宫颈细胞涂片法,能大大提高检出率,尤其是对LSIL和HSIL的患者。Objective To evaluate the accuracy and efficiency of routine paint and liquid-based cytology for cervical disease, especially for cervical carcinoma. Methods 2 186 and 2 219 patients were screened for cervical carcinoma with TCT and traditional cervical cells smears respectively. Results The above-LISL pathological changes identified by TCT and traditional smears were 4.35% and 1.67 % respectively. There was significant difference between the two groups(P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion TCT is more sensitive than traditional cervical cells smears. Liquid-based cytology can improve the detection rate of LSIL in cervical screen,especially in HSL and HSIL.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.190.238