检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李清亚[1] 王晓慧[1] 刘杰[1] 程俊[1] 李晓楠[1] 张清洁[1] 王耀东[1] 谷军川[1] 李秀珍[1] 张尚荣[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军第261医院国家中医药管理局中西医结合治疗抑郁症重点专病中心,北京100094
出 处:《中华中医药学刊》2009年第9期1889-1891,共3页Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:首发基金重点支持类课题(SF-2007-Ⅱ-04)
摘 要:目的:比较中西医结合与单纯应用西药治疗抑郁症的疗效与安全性。方法:将126例抑郁症患者随机分为两组,分别为中西医结合组(氟西汀联合中药)与单纯应用西药组(氟西汀),疗程4周,用汉密顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评定临床疗效,用副反应量表(TESS)评定不良反应。结果:4周末两组总有效率、HAMD评分、不良反应均有显著性差异。结论:中西医结合治疗组治疗效果优于单纯应用西药组。中药可明显减少抗抑郁药引起的副反应。Objective:To compare the efficacy of Chinese medcial herb and fluoxetine in the treatment of depression. Methods : 126 patients with depression were randomly assigned to Chinese medieal herb group and fluoxetine group for 4 weeks. The efficacy was evaluated with Hamilton depression scale(HAMD). The side effects was evaluated with treatment emergent symptoms scale(TESS). Results :The total score of HAMD and clinical efficacy in fluoxetine group was significantly lower than that in Chinese medieial herb group after 4 weeks. The side effects in Chinese medical herb group was significantly lower than that in fluoxetine group after 4 weeks. Conclusion : The combinative treatment of Chinese medicine herb and fluoxetine has a good effect on depression. The Chinese medicine herb can confrontation depression side effects.
分 类 号:R749.4[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28