检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国药科大学,南京211198
出 处:《中国卫生法制》2009年第5期14-18,共5页China Health Law
摘 要:本文旨在理顺药品行政执法与刑事司法的关系,强化药品执法力度,为修改《药品管理法》奠定理论基础。文章运用规范研究方法、比较法学和案例分析法对中美药品行刑联动机制作深入的比较分析。通过研究发现我国药品执法行刑联动机制存在的问题,并借鉴美国药品行刑联动机制建设经验,提出修改《药品管理法》的建议。The study aimed to rationalize relationship between the drug law enforcement and criminal justice, to strengthen drug law enforcement, and lay a theoretical foundation for the amendment of the Pharmaceutical Administration Law. The article made a comparative analysis on the linkage mechanism of administrative organs and criminal justice agencies in China and the USA through specification studies, comparative law, case studies. According to the comparative analysis, we found that there are still some deficiencies in the linkage mechanism of administrative organs and criminal justice agencies of China. We propose some suggestions for the amendment of the Pharmaceutical Administration Law upon successful experiences of the FDA.
分 类 号:R197[医药卫生—卫生事业管理] R954[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222