检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘品新[1]
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2009年第5期119-127,共9页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助青年项目<网络时代刑事司法的理念与制度创新>(08CFX941)
摘 要:原件规则是一条古老的证据法则,电子证据是一种新型的证据,两者的结合构成了当代各国证据法的一大挑战。国外关于电子证据原件的理论有"功能等同法"、"拟制原件说"、"混合标准说"、"复式原件说"以及"结合打印说"等等。目前我国的电子证据属于混杂的体系,相应地电子证据原件规则也应当是分门别类,即推行一套多层次的理论体系。Original rule is an ancient but important evidence role. How can it be used to the newly electronic evidence? What is the original standard of this evidenee? This article starts with an analysis of a discussion from "Original Medium Theory" to "Original Nihilism" in China, introduces and compares the mainly theories in foreign countries and international organizations, such as Functional-equivalence Principle, Fictional Original Doctrine, Mixture Standards Doctrine, Double - original Doctrine, and Conjoint - printings Doctrine. In the final section, this article focuses on how to create Chinese original theories of electronic evidence. It draws a conclusion that China may develop a variety of integrative theories in view of electronic evidence's multiple.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249