SD球帽式附着体义齿与传统可摘局部义齿修复后基牙存留状况分析  

Comparative study on condition of abutments between the SD ball-cap attachment dentures and traditional removable partial dentures at different stage

作　　者：钟爱喜[1] 潘小波[1] 彭利辉[1] 刘光雪[1] 黄燕飞[1] 李荣婷[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西壮族自治区人民医院口腔科,副主任医师广西530021

出　　处：《口腔颌面修复学杂志》2009年第4期233-235,共3页Chinese Journal of Prosthodontics

基　　金：广西壮族自治区卫生厅科研课题(项目编号:Z2007152)

摘　　要：目的:比较研究SD球帽式附着体义齿和传统可摘局部义齿不同时期基牙的存留状况。方法:选择60例肯氏Ⅰ类牙列缺损患者,分别行SD球帽式附着体义齿(30例)和传统可摘局部义齿(30例)修复,于修复前及修复后半年、1年、2年、4年检查基牙的龋患及牙周情况,并作统计学分析。结果:两种义齿的基牙龋患率有显著性差异(P<0.05);而2组病例的基牙牙龈炎、牙周炎发病率无显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:在肯氏Ⅰ类牙列缺损的修复中,SD球帽式附着体义齿基牙患龋率远远低于传统可摘局部义齿,但在对牙周组织的损害方面,SD球帽式附着体义齿并不比传统可摘局部义齿更具优越性。Objective： To study the condition of abutments between the SD ball-cap attachment dentures and traditional removable partial dentures at different stage. Methods： 60 kennedy type I dentition defect patients were selected and the differences were checked about the cariogenesis, gingivitis and periodontitis of the abutments between SD ball-cap attachment dentures and traditional removable partial denturts. At different stage, the result was compared with each other. Results： There was significant difference on cariogenesis with the two kinds of dentures, but not on gingivitis and periodontitis. Conclusion： The cariogensis of the abutments of the patients wearing the SD ball-cap attachment denture is much lower than that wearing tradional removable partial dentures at different stage, but the gingivitis and periodontitis of abutments are not different between the two kinds of dentures.

关 键 词：SD球帽 传统可摘局部义齿 龋患率 牙周损害 

分 类 号：R783[医药卫生—口腔医学]