被告人翻供口供审查认定的理论探讨——对被告人翻供案件证据的认定  

Theoretical Discussion on Inspection and Affirmation of Cases Relating to the Accused Revoking Their Confession

作　　者：郑高键[1] 

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《西部法学评论》2009年第3期97-101,共5页Western Law Review

摘　　要：我国刑事诉讼法将被告人的口供(供述和辩解)规定为刑事诉讼的七种证据之一;但口供的特点又导致犯罪嫌疑人、被告人翻供在我国刑事审判实践中比较常见。这在一定程度上增强了司法实践中对口供及案件证据运用和认定的难度。规范口供运用和认定的法律标准、刑事证据规则和刑事案件的证明标准的相关理论,才能正确地审查判断与认定口供。Chinese criminal procedure law stipulates oral confession-statement and defense as one of seven evidences of the criminal suspect and the accused. However, The oral confession＇s characteristic always results in their overthrowing their confession in Chinese criminal trial practice, which makes it difficult for the oral confession and case evidence in judicial practice to a certain extent to be confirmed and applied. The correct judgment and the proper confirmation are achieved by regulating the application and affirmation of legal standard of oral confession with relative theory of criminal evidence rules and proof standard.

关 键 词：口供 翻供 证据规则 证明标准 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]