检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:蒋涤非[1]
出 处:《西部法学评论》2009年第3期120-126,共7页Western Law Review
摘 要:在我国的刑事诉讼过程中,被告人的防御能力过差,其原因很大部分缘于刑事被告人的调查取证能力过于薄弱。为了提高刑事被告人的诉讼防御能力,有必要从加强刑事被告人调查取证能力和限制检控方调查取证能力两方面进行体系构建。笔者认为,扩大刑事被告方调查取证的主体范围,丰富刑事被告方调查取证的手段,赋予刑事被告人的家属"免证权"和废除补充侦查制度是构建该防御能力体系的主要内容。The root of the defendant's poor defense in Chinese current criminal procedure is originated from the defendant's weak capability of collecting evidence. In order to improve it, It's necessary to built the system from two angles: one is the enhancement of the defendant's investigation ability; the other is the reduction of the ability of prosecutor. The author points out that a new balanced model of defendant defense system in criminal procedure should contain the following major components: (1) expand the scope of the main subject in the name of defendant; (2) diversify the means of taking evidence; (3)grant the defendant's relatives the right to be free from submitting evidence; (4) abolish the prosecutors right of supplementary detection.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28