检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]昆明医学院附属口腔医院,云南昆明650031
出 处:《昆明医学院学报》2009年第9期65-66,72,共3页Journal of Kunming Medical College
摘 要:目的评价喷砂法处理牙面对恒磨牙窝沟封闭保留时间的影响.方法采用随机分组对照实验,实验组在窝沟封闭前用喷砂法处理牙面,对照组用传统慢机清除牙面色素菌斑,分别观察两组0.5a、1a、2a后窝沟封闭保存率,并进行统计学分析.结果封闭后6个月,两组保存率差异无统计学意义.1a、2a后实验组保存率分别达到97.8%,95.5%,明显高于对照组90.4%,81.8%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论与传统的慢机法处理牙面比较,喷砂法处理牙面能延长恒磨牙窝沟封闭保留时间,值得临床推广使用.Objective To observe the influence of kavo prophyflex 3 applied in sealant technique on sealing the permanent teeth fissure. Methods Patients with permanent teeth fissure were divided randomly into contol group and experiment group. Kavo prophyflex 3 was applied in first permanent molars of patients in experiment group, and conventional clear technique was applied in first permanent molars of patients in contol group. Sealant retention rates were compared 0.5 a, 1 a and 2 a after treatment between eontol group and experiment group. Results There was no significant difference in the sealant retention rate 6 months after treatment between the contol group and experiment group. However, significant difference was observed la and 2 a after treatment between the contol group and experiment group (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Sealant with kavo prophyflex 3 is more effective than conventional sealant technique in prolonging the sealant retention time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3