检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘笋[1]
机构地区:[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430073
出 处:《现代法学》2009年第5期122-130,共9页Modern Law Science
基 金:国家社科基金资助项目(05BFX050)
摘 要:近年来,国际投资仲裁案件迅猛增加,不仅使东道国主权面临挑战,也引起出现有投资条约的诸多设计缺陷所导致的仲裁合法性危机。改造投资仲裁机制已经不再仅仅停留在学术争鸣阶段而是迅速发展到具体的条约改革实践阶段。其中,建立仲裁的上诉机制就是这种改革实践的一种具体表现。建立仲裁的上诉机制是对传统投资仲裁体制的重大变革,尚存在许多理论争议和政治及法律障碍,但由于这种改革已经进入实践阶段并由美国积极倡导,势必对国际投资争端解决的未来发展趋势产生重要影响。In recent years, an enormous increase of international investment arbitration not only challenges the sovereignty of host states, but also exposes the legitimacy problems of arbitration arising out of the defects of the design of existing investment treaties. Reform of international investment arbitration mechanism is thus no longer an academic and theoretical issue, but a practical process of treaty makings, of which establishment of an appellate review mechanism has drawn much attention. The appellate review seems an important reform to traditional investment arbitration system. Though far from matured in theory, politics or law, it is advocated and experienced positively in the USA and will inevitably produce a great influence for the future of international investment dispute resolution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:13.58.11.68