文革前“十七年”中国史学的片断反思  

Fragments of Reflection on Chinese Historiography in the "Seventeen Years" before the Cultural Revolution

作　　者：罗志田[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学历史文化学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2009年第5期5-15,共11页Journal of Sichuan University：Philosophy and Social Science Edition

摘　　要：文革前"十七年"中国大陆史学发展的状况可分为初期的过渡和后期的发展两段考察。初期史学受外在时势的影响比其他时段更大,各类学术建制的改造和新建受到自上而下的关注,体现了有计划、有组织的新型办事特色。研究者思想和学术的转变明显,但老先生对新方法往往努力学而学不会。那时大多数人惯于思考宏观问题,所谓"五朵金花"就是代表。学科上提倡注重近代史研究,但真正落实经历了一个较长的过程。在今日史学言说中,"十七年"的史学处于一种失语状态,这种学统的中断导致"与国际接轨"的异化。The historiography in Chinese mainland during the ＂ seventeen years＂ before the Cultural Revolution can be studied in two stages： one is the early transitional period and the other is the development period. During the early period, the historical studies was under ever stronger foreign influence, and the revolution and establishment of all kinds of historical institutions were closely observed from top to bottom, representing the new style o{ doing things according to plans and organizations. It is obvious that the concepts of researchers and their works underwent changes, but some distinguished scholars could not apply the new methodology although they had tried to learn. In the seventeen years, most researchers used to work on macroscopic issues, the very representatives being the so--called ＂ five golden flowers. ＂ Though it was advocated to emphasize studies of modern history, the real practice still underwent a rather long passage of time. From today＇s perspective, historical studies in the seventeen years was under the state of loss of words. The interruption of the academic tradition resulted in the alienation from the ＂ trend of linking the international. ＂

关 键 词：现代中国史学 1949—1966年的中国 学术传统 宏大问题与具体研究 国家(state)与学术 

分 类 号：K092.71[历史地理—历史学] K092.72