打开群体诉讼之门——由“三鹿奶粉”事件看群体诉讼优越性的衡量原则  

Open the Gate of Group Litigation

作　　者：王福华[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2009年第5期97-109,共13页China Legal Science

摘　　要：对已提起诉讼的群体纠纷,群体诉讼相对于其他解纷方式具有优越性,是诉讼得以成立和推进的前提条件。不久前发生的"三鹿奶粉事件"为研究群体诉讼优越性衡量原则提供了极佳范本。对群体诉讼的优越性,应依据诉讼经济、程序保障、替代方法优先及程序可管理等原则做出判断。"三鹿奶粉"索赔程序的选择适用也应以这些原则为依据。于我国代表人诉讼中增设优越性衡量原则,可增强程序可操作性,抑制程序滥用,并能促进行业规范经营。The superiority of group litigation which compared with other solutions for resovling the filed group disputes, is the prerequisite for litigation establishing and proceeding. The recent ＂ Sanlu milk powder incident＂ provides an excellent template for studying the superiority measurement principle of the group litigation. The judging of group litigation superiority should be based on litigation economy, procedural safeguard, priority of alternative methods, and manageable procedures. The choice of the procedure for the claims of ＂Sanlu milk powder＂ should be based on these principles as well. Adding the superiority measurement principle to China＇s representative litigation can enhance the operability of procedures, suppressing the abuse of process and promote the regulated operating of the industry as a whole.

关 键 词：群体诉讼 集团诉讼 代表人诉讼 诉讼优越性 

分 类 号：D915.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]