检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴婉玲[1] 卢锡林[1] 郑民缨[1] 梁伟[2] 姚晓黎[1] 胡正路[3]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第一医院神经科,广东广州510080 [2]中山大学附属第一医院病案室,广东广炼510080 [3]中山大学附属第一医院公共卫生学院,广东广州510080
出 处:《中华医院感染学杂志》2009年第20期2753-2754,共2页Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
基 金:广东省博士启动基金资助项目(5300783);广东省科技计划项目(2006B36003003)
摘 要:目的研究组织化卒中管理模式对医院感染的影响。方法自2002年1月-2006年12月的脑卒中患者共2637例,随机进入组织化卒中病房(研究组)和普通神经科病房(对照组),比较两组的医院感染发生率。结果研究组的医院感染发生率为10.81%,感染部位以呼吸道和泌尿道为主,分别占66.67%和23.33%;对照组感染发生率为13.66%,呼吸道和泌尿道感染分别占69.70%和19.70%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论组织化卒中管理模式对预防脑卒中患者医院感染的发生较普通神经科病房更具有优越性。OBJECTIVE To study the impact of nosocomial infection on stroke patients in the organized stroke ward. METHODS Totally 2637 patients with acute stroke were investigated in our study from Jan 2002 to Dec 2006. All patients were sent randomly to organized stroke ward or the general ward (GW) for treatment. Then the nosocomial infection ratio between groups were compared. RESULTS Compared with GW, the nosocomial infection ratio of tested group was 10. 81%, mainly resulted from respiratory (66. 67%) and urinary infection (23.33%). while 13.66% in control group, mainly resulted from respiratory (69.70%) and urinary infection (19.70%). The nosocomial infection ratio of tested group was significant lower than that of control group (P〈0.05). CONCLUSIONS It is more superior to reduce the hospital onset of infection ratio in organized stroke ward than in the general ward.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.13