医疗纠纷解决制度评析——以英、德、美为参照  

Analysis on the mechanism to resolve medical disputes——by the reference to the systems of Britain, Germany, the United States

作　　者：马辉[1] 王俊杰[1] 赵学伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学,北京100069

出　　处：《卫生软科学》2009年第5期565-567,共3页Soft Science of Health

基　　金：2007年度首都医科发展科研基金项目"医疗风险的防范机制研究"(2007-3046)

摘　　要：与英、德、美横向比较,我国医疗侵权诉讼法律制度本身具有保护患者的倾向;我国存在非诉解决制度,制度设计并无不当;医疗纠纷解决制度无法有效运作的原因:一是非法解决途径的高效性;二是目前的诉讼制度与医疗卫生服务模式不相适应;三是非诉制度的参照物和潜在强制手段—诉讼制度处于变化之中。Compared with Britain, Germany and the United States, the China＇s litigation mechanism on medical tort is inclined to protect clients. The non-lawsuit settling mechanism is existed without any defects There are several reasons contributing to that the mechanism of resolving the medical dispute cannot work effectively： the non-lawsuit settling mechanism works effectively; the litigation system is not incompatible with the present health service mode; and as the reference and the potential compulsive measure of the non-lawsuit system, the lawsuit system is changing.

关 键 词：诉讼 非诉 制度 原因 

分 类 号：R-052[医药卫生]