检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]武汉理工大学物流工程学院,湖北武汉430063
出 处:《武汉理工大学学报(信息与管理工程版)》2009年第5期842-844,856,共4页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Information & Management Engineering
基 金:"十一.五"国家重点科研基金资助项目(2006BAH02A06)
摘 要:对产品回收系统中库存价值评价的AC模型和DCF模型进行了比较研究,论证了传统的成本价格推论并不适合于回收系统库存价值的评价。提出的持有成本转换率能够近似将平均成本转换成折扣现金流,而且,这些转换率完全不同于传统的成本价格推论所推导的比率。AC and DCF models used to estimate valuation of inventories were compared and analyzed in systems with product recovery.The traditional concept that "cost price deduction" disagrees with valuation of inventories with product recovery was verified.It was suggested that the holding cost transforming rates can approximately transform average cost(AC) into the discounted cash flow(DCF),and the rates differ from the rates that the traditional "cost price deduction" produces.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249