检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐跃军[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学管理学院,上海200433
出 处:《中国工业经济》2009年第10期67-76,共10页China Industrial Economics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"大股东治理战略研究:基于大股东制衡与外部监管的实证与实验"(批准号70802015);"211工程"三期重点学科建设项目"中国产业的科学发展与自主创新"(批准号211XK06)
摘 要:传统的企业与企业的竞争已经演化为供应链与供应链(或产业链与产业链)之间的竞争,这使得改进供应链(或产业链)管理成为提升公司竞争力的必由之路。本文利用来自2005—2007年中国制造业上市公司的经验证据,探讨供应商和经销商(客户)议价能力对公司业绩可能存在的影响以及具体的影响程度和影响方式。实证研究证实:①供应商、经销商(客户)的集中度和议价能力越低,公司业绩越好;②供应商的集中度和议价能力与公司业绩之间表现为倒"U"形关系;③和已有的研究不同,经销商(客户)的集中度和议价能力在与公司业绩显著负相关的同时,表现为左高右低的正"U"形关系。The traditional competition among companies has evolved into competition among supply chains (or industry chains), hence the improvement of supply chains (or industry chains) management becomes absolutely necessary for promotion of enterprise competitive power. Based on empirical evidence from Chinese manufacturing listed companies between 2005 and 2007, this paper explores the impact suppliers and franchisers (buyers) may have on corporate performance, as well as the impact degree and means. The empirical research proves that: (1)lower the concentration degree of suppliers and franchisers (buyers) is, better corporate performance will be; (2)suppliers' concentration degree and bargaining power have an inverted U-shape relationship with corporate performance; (3)different from existing researches, franchisers' (buyers') concentration degree and bargaining power have significant negative relationship with corporate performance; meanwhile, a U-shape relationship with higher left wing and lower right wing exists between them.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222