自由还是平等——诺奇克和罗尔斯的正义观比较  

Freedom or equality——Comparison between Nozick's and Rawls' views of justice

作　　者：张艳梅[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学马克思主义学院,长春130012

出　　处：《长春工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2009年第3期4-6,共3页Journal of Changchun Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：分析了诺奇克和罗尔斯看待平等、国家的功能和分配问题上的不同观点,指出诺奇克主张的正义是尊重人们选择权的程序性的正义,罗尔斯主张的正义是有利于最少受惠者的实质性的正义。二者揭示了正义的两个性质。This paper analyzes the different views of Nozick s and Rawls held on equality,functions of a country and distribution.It points out that Nozick s view of justice is a procedural one which respects people s right to choose,while Rawls view of justice is an essential one which benefits the few favored ones.Both the two views reveal the two natures of justice.

关 键 词：诺奇克 罗尔斯 正义 自由 平等 

分 类 号：B82-051[哲学宗教—伦理学]