检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董振南[1] 丁慧[1] 贾兴旺[1] 金剑 田亚平[1]
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院生化科,北京100853 [2]瑞典康乃格诊断公司,北京100022
出 处:《标记免疫分析与临床》2009年第5期294-295,共2页Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
基 金:国家科技部863计划项目(2006AA02090206)
摘 要:对肿瘤相关抗原CA19-9酶联免疫法(ELISA法)进行方法学评价。选取各类标本204份,将本方法的灵敏度、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值与电化学发光免疫分析(ECLIA)的进行比较并综合分析。本方法检测的灵敏度为52.5%,特异性为82.9%,阳性预测值为82.1%,阴性预测值为54.0%。以ECLIA为相对标准,相对灵敏度为100%,相对特异性为100%,相对符合率为100%,与ECLIA相关性显著,r2=0.9749。相关分析结果表明,ELISA与ECLIA相关性好。本方法试剂稳定,结果准确、可靠,有很高的特异性。To evaluate the methodology of ELISA assay for CA19-9,204 serum samples were selected into this study. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of this method was evalua- ted with compared reagent. The sensitivity of this method was 52.5% ,specificity was 82.9% ,PPV was 82.1% and NPV was 54.0%. When ECLIA was set as relative standard, the relative sensitivity, specificity and consis- tency were 100% , 100% and 100% respectively. The correlation coefficient was good and the relativity had sta- tistic significant different. The results indicate that the reagent used in this study is stable, and the measurement result is correct and reliable with high specificity.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.35