检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:殷文明[1] 顾文栋[1] 沐金明[1] 裴红蕾[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省常州市第一人民医院放射肿瘤科,213003
出 处:《中国现代医药杂志》2009年第10期41-44,共4页Modern Medicine Journal of China
摘 要:目的通过CT模拟定位技术制定照射野与"常规照射野"相比较来说明两者的优劣。方法2007年1月~2008年3月共19例宫颈癌术后患者行增强CT扫描,并在治疗计划系统(TPS)上按照骨性标志和血管CTV设定"常规照射野"和"CT照射野",并分别比较不同等剂量曲线对PTV的包绕程度。结果"CT照射野"的靶区包绕程度明显优于"常规照射野",前者95%等剂量曲线包绕PTV体积明显优于后者,其差值接近20%。而这种差异主要体现在"常规照射野"对髂总PTV和髂外PTV的遗漏。结论在常规X线模拟定位机下根据骨性标志来设定的"常规照射野"并不一定适合宫颈癌等盆腔肿瘤的外照射,因为它可能会遗漏一部分髂总、髂外淋巴结引流区以及部分瘤床。照射野必须根据增强CT来设定,最好是应用基于CT的虚拟模拟定位技术。Objective A part of cervical carcinoma required postoperative radiotherapy. The radiation field used to be based on bone mark of pelvis. However, the "conventional radiation field" could not involve all of the target volume. This study compared "conventional radiation field" and "CT-simulation radiation field" by CT-simulation technology on treatment planning system. Methods Total 19 patients with cervical carcinoma entered this study from January 2007 to March 2008. "Conventional radiation field" and "CT-simulation radiation field" were planned based on bone mark of pelvis and CTV, separately. And then the isodose curve involving PTV were compared with paired-samples T test. Results "CT-simulation radiation field" was superior to "conventional radiation field", and the 95% isodose curve involving PTV volume of the former was about 20% more than the latter. The difference was resulted by "conventional radiation field" missing a part of common iliac and external iliac lymph nodes. Conclusion The "conventional radiation field" may not fit all because it missed some common lilac and external iliac lymph nodes and tumor bed. The best radiation field should be based on CT-simulation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117