论学术评价机制的完善  

On the Consummation of Academic Evaluation Mechanism

作　　者：杨敏[1] 李学永[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东政法学院民商法学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《政法论丛》2009年第5期90-96,共7页Journal of Political Science and Law

基　　金：山东省软科学研究计划项目:防范学术不端行为的制度建设问题研究(2007RKA137)

摘　　要：现代管理主义的兴起对学术产生了冲击,使得学术职业的传统和特有的价值理念受到了前所未有的冲击,使学术不端行为的产生成为必然。现行学术评价机制的缺陷主要包括考核指标体系不合理,评价方式和程序的异化。不合理的评价机制对学术不端起了推波助澜的作用。因此要建立新的学术评价机制;建立多样化的评价体系,使评价标准理性化。同时要建立正当的学术评价程序,学术问题只能由学者解决,专家评议必须有规范的程序。The rise of modem rnanagerialism have an assault on the academic, the traditions and values of the academic career have been unprecedented assaulted, so that the rise of academic misconduct is inevitable. The existing shortcomings of academic evaluation mechanism include unreasonable inspection indicator system , the alienation of evaluation methods and process . Unreasonable academic evaluation mechanism play a bad role in the rise of academic misconduct . So a new academic evaluation mechanisms is necessary to establish. Evaluation system should be more diverse, evaluation standard should be more rational. At the same time we should establish proper procedures for academic evaluation, academic problems can only be solved by the scholars, the experts evaluation must have a standard procedure.

关 键 词：学术评价机制 评价标准 评价程序 

分 类 号：D630.3[政治法律—政治学] G322[政治法律—中外政治制度]