WTO与我国行政诉讼原告资格的重新界定  

WTO and China's Administrative Litigation qualified to redefine the plaintiff

作　　者：向忠诚[1] 

机构地区：[1]桂林电子科技大学,广西桂林541004

出　　处：《行政与法》2009年第10期80-83,共4页Administration and Law

摘　　要：在加入WTO的《议定书》和《工作组报告书》中,我国承诺享有诉权的是"受到被复审的任何行政行为影响的个人或企业"。我国现行的合法权益标准下的法律利害关系标准虽然对行政诉讼原告资格作了扩大性的解释,但与WTO的要求相比仍然存在差距。将法律上的利益作为界定行政诉讼原告资格的标准,是我国切实履行WTO义务的要求。The accession to WTO in the ＂Protocol＂ and ＂Report of the Working Group＂,our commitment to the enjoyment of the right to appeal is ＂subject to review by any administrative actions by individuals and businesses affeeted.＂China＇s legitimate rights and interests of the existing standards of the legal interest under the standards while administrative proceedings were made to ex- pand the eligibility of the plaintiff＇s explanation,but compared with the requirements of WTO is still a gap. To the interests of legal administrative proceedings,as defined in the eligibility criteria for the plaintiff,is my obligation to carry out the requirements of WTO.

关 键 词：行政诉讼 原告资格 WTO规则 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]