检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安高新医院口腔科,陕西西安710075 [2]西安交通大学口腔医学院
出 处:《中国美容医学》2009年第10期1500-1502,共3页Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
摘 要:目的:临床对比观察3种方法对隐裂磨牙根管治疗中的保护效果。方法:选用正畸带环、临时树脂全冠、钢丝环扎3种方法对隐裂磨牙根管治疗前进行保护,并就患牙保留疗效、不良反应、保护装置外形进行临床对比。结果:正畸带环组、临时树脂全冠组在患牙保留有效率方面显著优于钢丝环扎组;临时树脂全冠组在不良反应、保护装置外形方面优于正畸带环组。结论:隐裂牙根管治疗前制作临时树脂全冠对保护患牙,防止冠折有良好的效果,同时不良反应更少。Objective To observe the clinical effects of three methods protecting cracked molar teeth during root canal treatment. Methods We Applied the orthodontic band,temporary full veneer crown and steel-wire cerclage to protect cracked molar teeth before root canal treatment. Compare the reserve curative effects of the cracked molar teeth, adverse effects and protectors" shape of the three methods. Results The group of orthodontic band and the temporary full veneer crown had an advantage curative effect in reserve curative effects of the cracked molar teeth. The group of temporary full veneer crown was better than the group of orthodontic band in adverse effects and protectors' shape. Conclusion Applying the temporary full veneer crown before the root canal treatment for cracked teeth can avoid crown fracture and induce less adverse effects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28