超声乳化与现代囊外摘除治疗白内障的疗效观察  

Clinical effect of phacoemulsification aspiration and extracapsular cataract extraction in the treatment of cataract

作　　者：王明磊[1] 刘洋[1] 魏霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民解放军321医院眼科,中国吉林省白城市137000

出　　处：《国际眼科杂志》2009年第10期1963-1964,共2页International Eye Science

摘　　要：目的:探讨超声乳化的白内障吸除术与隧道式切口现代囊外白内障摘除术的治疗效果。方法:总结我院2002/2004年间在我院住院部分年龄相关性白内障患者的临床资料,共选择了342眼行隧道式切口现代囊外白内障摘除术的患者及578眼行超声乳化的白内障吸除术的患者,并对两种手术方法术后在视力、内皮细胞损伤、术后散光、远期效果、术后并发症的发生率等进行比对。结果:两种手术方式在术后视力恢复、内皮细胞损伤、术后散光、远期效果、术后并发症等方面无明显的差异。结论:在临床应用中超声乳化的白内障吸除术与隧道式切口现代囊外白内障摘除术的治疗效果无明显差异。AIM： To compare the effects of phacoemulsification aspiration（PHACO） and extracapsular cataract extraction （ECCE） in the treatment of cataract. METHODS： The clinical data of the cases with agerelated cataract from 2002 to 2004 were summarized. Of them, 342 cases received ECCE and 578 cases underwent PHACO. Visual acuity, endothelial cell injury, postoperative astigmatism, long-term effect and the incidence of complications were compared. RESULTS： There were no significant differences in visual acuity, endothelial cell injury, postoperative astigmatism, long-term effect and the incidence of complications between two surgical groups. CONCLUSION： The result indicates that the treatment effects of PHACO and ECCE have no significant difference.

关 键 词：超声乳化 白内障 囊外摘除 

分 类 号：R779.66[医药卫生—眼科] R644[医药卫生—临床医学]